1) Pull the Exact Order Language
Find the signed order and identify the provision involved. Include enough surrounding text to show the requirement in context, along with any later order that changes it.
Last updated:
When an order is not being followed as you understand it, begin with the exact requirement and a dated account of what happened. Save the messages and records supporting each incident. Those materials help your attorney assess whether enforcement is appropriate and what additional evidence may be needed.

Find the signed order and identify the provision involved. Include enough surrounding text to show the requirement in context, along with any later order that changes it.
For each denied exchange, missed return, notice concern or payment issue, record the date, what was required and what occurred. Add the source supporting the entry so the chronology can be checked.
Save complete relevant texts, emails and app exchanges, including requests, responses and explanations. Record the dates so a reviewer can follow notice and communication around each event.
Identify witnesses who saw the event and records that may confirm it, such as an exchange record or payment history. An investigator can interview relevant witnesses or document a specific recurring event within the agreed scope.
Connect each incident to the requirement you believe it concerns. If the order is ambiguous or several orders apply, ask counsel to identify the controlling language before planning further work.
A dated list lets counsel compare incidents and locate supporting records. You can include a short overview, then use the timeline to show the events behind it.
Preserve the date and surrounding conversation for a screenshot. For an exchange or payment concern, identify any available witness or record, and be clear when no independent corroboration is available.
Repeated noncompliance may become relevant to a later modification request or other disputed issue. Record each event accurately, including its effect, so counsel can assess the pattern and the legal options.
Save proposed solutions, responses, explanations and any partial compliance. The sequence should show what each person tried and what occurred afterward, rather than only the moments when agreement failed.
Label entries by the order requirement they concern, such as parenting time, notice or support. A payment history and an exchange log may both matter, but counsel needs to see the evidence for each enforcement issue.
That depends on the order, incident and legal remedy. Repeated events may show a pattern, but a single serious, well-documented incident may also matter. Ask counsel to assess the requirements for the particular request.
Yes. Messages may show when notice was given, what was requested and how the other person responded. Preserve the relevant conversation so counsel can assess knowledge and conduct in context.
Yes. An investigator can document specified exchanges or other conduct, interview witnesses and compare records with a dated chronology. The report supplies facts for counsel to assess against the order.
Yes. Ask counsel which requirement and remedy are at issue, then identify the missing facts. That direction helps the investigator plan work that serves the enforcement question.
It may. Preserve the actual contempt orders as well as the underlying chronology and records. Counsel can assess how repeated noncompliance relates to any later modification request.
Share the current order and a dated list of the incidents you want checked. We can discuss observation, interviews or records work and prepare findings linked to their sources.