Organize by Issue
Use categories that match the dispute, such as exchanges, income changes, residence or child safety. Put a short description beside each item explaining which event or question it supports.
Last updated:
The records you need depend on the question in your case. A missed-exchange dispute may turn on the parenting plan and messages; a support dispute may require current income and business records. Begin with the relevant order, then gather the documents that show what happened and when.

| Record Type | Why It Matters | Common Mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Court orders and parenting plans | They define the terms the facts need to be matched against. | Quoting the dispute without tying it back to the actual order language. |
| Communications | Texts, emails and co-parenting apps may establish when notice was given, what was agreed and how an explanation changed. | Saving isolated screenshots with no sequence or date context. |
| School and childcare records | May document attendance, pickup routines, lateness and which caregivers were involved on particular dates. | Treating them as self-explanatory without connecting them to the case issue. |
| Program or provider records | Testing, treatment, supervised visitation, and class records may show compliance or concern patterns. | Overstating what those records prove on their own. |
| Financial and business records | May identify employment, business connections or discrepancies that need further review in a support or income dispute. | Guessing conclusions instead of organizing verifiable sources. |
| Photos, video, and logs | These are strongest when dated, lawful, and tied to a chronology. | Collecting media without context, source notes, or timeline placement. |
Use categories that match the dispute, such as exchanges, income changes, residence or child safety. Put a short description beside each item explaining which event or question it supports.
List events by date and point to the supporting record for each entry. Note gaps and conflicting dates so counsel can see what is established and what may need further investigation.
For each record, note its source, the dates it covers and how you obtained it. Retain complete relevant message threads and original files so a later reviewer can understand the context.
Preserve relevant material you lawfully hold, then create an index for review rather than deleting items just to shorten the file. Ask counsel which categories matter and what preservation duties apply to your case.
Missing dates, cropped conversations and unclear sources make a record harder to interpret. Add context and connect the item to a specific question without claiming it proves more than it shows.
An investigator can compare the records, build a source-linked timeline and identify a defined fact needing verification. Depending on that gap, the work may include lawful record retrieval, witness interviews or observation, followed by a factual report.
Yes. Early review helps counsel identify the categories needed for the next decision and any records that require a particular access or legal process. That can prevent duplicate collection and direct further work.
Bring the relevant order, your records and a short description of what remains disputed. We can discuss a chronology or verification task and the report it would produce for you or your attorney.