Infidelity and Affair Investigations
Document relevant meetings, routines and residence patterns while observing Washington’s privacy and recording limits.
Last updated:
Before requesting records, recording a conversation or arranging service of papers, it helps to understand the limits. Here are the Washington-specific source and access considerations from our service guidance. We investigate facts; legal advice and decisions about procedure remain with counsel.
Use the current court instructions and the order in your own case. These notes explain factual preparation, not legal advice or a promise that evidence will be admitted. Check dated rule and form references with the official source before relying on them.
Start with the family issue and the statement or event in dispute. The services below explain the records, observations and interviews that may help.
Document relevant meetings, routines and residence patterns while observing Washington’s privacy and recording limits.
Check disputed living arrangements, property use and financial connections against available records and dated observations.
Gather factual information about supervision, caregiving and exchanges for review under the current parenting orders.
Document scheduled versus actual exchanges, notices and returns, including records of agreed changes.
Investigate work activity, business connections and residence claims relevant to support or maintenance questions.
Preserve incident and contact evidence for attorney review of restraining, protection and criminal no-contact order matters.
Identify the court handling the case, the order or event in dispute and the relevant locations. Witnesses, exchanges and records may be in different counties from the filing. Those locations and the expected activity windows determine the practical work.
The Washington Courts forms directory provides statewide forms and notes that individual courts may require additional forms or local rules. Check the court’s current instructions with counsel. Our investigation report supplies factual findings; it does not replace the required declaration, filing or legal advice.
Bring the current order, relevant dates, records you lawfully hold and the hearing date if known. Identify what you witnessed personally and what someone else reported. Preserve original files, noting any annotations separately, and tell us about restrictions on access or contact.
RCW 18.165 describes Washington’s private investigator framework. Washington Courts provides forms and instructions that may be relevant when a locate supports service or a family case. These sources are informational; counsel advises on the applicable court requirements.
A person may have moved across Washington since the last court date or service attempt. We research address history, lawful work-location clues, and other records to identify possible current locations, then explain which leads are supported and which need checking. Access and disclosure limits apply; voluntary adult-location work requires the person’s permission before we share their location.
We compare prior Washington addresses and dates with public records and lawful commercial-database leads. Identity checks help distinguish the right person from someone with a similar name, while residence verification helps separate a current home from an old or mailing address.
Common examples: address-history research, public-record and commercial-database lead development, work-location clues, and residence-pattern verification.
Use cases: unauthorized child removal, relocation disputes, support enforcement, service planning, and cases where actual residence matters.
What you receive: possible addresses with supporting sources and dates, known inconsistencies, and a chronology that can inform counsel or a process server.
A missing or disputed address may affect service, a relocation dispute, or a support matter. Tell us the purpose and deadline so we can assess which leads are relevant and whether further verification is needed.
If a child is in immediate danger, call 911. If a child is missing, contact local law enforcement immediately and do not wait for skip-trace work. After those urgent steps, lawful locate research may help develop address and movement leads for counsel or law-enforcement coordination.
Compare a stated address with available records and lawful residence observations when parenting, relocation, or support questions depend on where someone lives.
Give a process server or attorney current address leads, their sources, and the results of any verification. The required service method and enforcement decisions remain separate from the search.
RCW 18.165 addresses Washington private investigators. Washington Courts’ forms and instructions can help identify court requirements, but address research alone does not complete service or decide an enforcement question. Consult counsel about the legal process.
RCW 18.165 - Washington private investigator framework
Washington Courts forms and instructions
Provide the last confirmed address, the date it was reliable, known Washington counties, and any previous attempts to locate or serve the person. We discuss whether more research or an in-person check is warranted before scheduling fieldwork.
Search and travel: Records may connect a person with several counties without proving where they live now. We explain the strongest leads, the limits of each source, and the additional travel or observation needed to test them.
Your address findings: The report identifies possible locations, dates, source records, and verification results for attorney or service planning. Our report is due by 9 p.m. Pacific on the next business day after the task finishes, including return travel. Completion after midnight uses that new calendar date. Business days exclude weekends and the listed 11 federal holidays and each holiday’s day-before/day-after period. Faster delivery costs $300 per report only when requested and accepted, plus report time. We notify you of revised timing for additional approved report work or priority delays.
Skip tracing means researching leads to find a person whose current location is uncertain. In family matters, it often involves checking old addresses, possible residences, and lawful work links for service, support, or relocation questions.
It may. We can research likely addresses and compare available records or approved observations before a service attempt. We cannot guarantee a current address or completed service, and we respect any order restricting contact.
No. Families use skip tracing for address verification, relocation and support disputes, and service planning. If a child is missing or in immediate danger, contact law enforcement immediately rather than waiting for a search.
RCW 18.165 addresses investigators, and RCW 9.73.030 addresses private communications and recording. Washington recording-consent rules apply to the proposed work. We assess the method and required consent before collection; lawful visual observation does not authorize recording a private conversation.
Washington’s private investigator framework is set out in RCW 18.165; RCW 9.73.030 addresses private communications and recording. Public-record research and authorized review remain subject to access limits, including protections for private accounts and restricted records.
Before marriage or a prenuptial agreement, you may need to verify a name, a business interest, a past case or a financial claim. We research those questions through lawful records and other verifiable sources in Washington. You receive the findings and their limits so you can discuss unresolved questions with your partner or attorney before deciding what to sign.
We start with the representations you want verified and the names, dates and records you already have. The research may include identity and aliases, civil or criminal case records, business filings and property leads. We compare records carefully to avoid attaching someone else’s history to your partner.
Records to check: Identity and aliases, prior litigation and criminal cases, business filings, property records and patterns that can be verified across sources.
Decisions this may inform: Marriage, prenuptial planning or a high-asset relationship where a personal or financial claim needs checking.
What you receive: Relevant record findings, their sources and dates, and a clear explanation of unresolved matches or claims that need further disclosure.
The scope depends on the decision in front of you. Checking a claimed business interest before signing is different from examining how property was used during an existing marriage.
Verify identity, business ties and relevant case history before making a marriage decision. We report what the records show, including when a concern is not supported.
Check disclosed business and property interests, liabilities visible in lawful records and prior legal issues. Your attorney can identify what further disclosure or financial advice is needed before signing.
Compare dated records of ownership, asset use and property control with what was disclosed in an existing marital agreement. Counsel determines the legal significance of any difference.
Identify the particular inconsistency—employment, an alias, property use, a prior relationship or a lifestyle claim—and research the sources that could confirm or explain it.
Washington’s investigator framework and private-communications law remain relevant to personal due diligence. The linked statutes do not authorize access to a partner’s private accounts or protected records.
RCW 18.165 - Washington private investigator framework
RCW 9.73.030 - Private communications and recording
Bring the specific claims you want checked, the records already disclosed and any approaching date for marriage or signing. We will discuss what can reasonably be researched and the likely costs.
Scope: We confirm the identities, jurisdictions and record categories to examine. A background investigation does not replace complete financial disclosure, valuation or independent legal advice.
Reporting: Your report records the work completed, findings and limits. It is due by 9 p.m. Pacific on the next business day after the task ends, including return travel. Completion after midnight counts as that new calendar date. Business days exclude weekends and the specified federal holiday periods, including the day before and after each holiday. Faster delivery costs $300 per report only when you request it and we accept, plus report-writing time. We notify you of an updated delivery date if approved additional report work or priority delays affect the schedule.
It can help when a specific claim about identity, a business, property or past litigation affects your decision to marry or sign. Starting with that claim lets us choose relevant records and identify what still needs to come directly from disclosure.
Lawful review can include public-record litigation history, criminal cases, business entities, property indicators, aliases, and other verifiable public-facing facts. We do not hack accounts, impersonate law enforcement, or obtain protected records illegally.
Yes. We can compare disclosure statements with dated business or property records and investigate factual questions about asset use or control during the marriage. Whether those findings affect an agreement is a question for your attorney.
Yes. With your authorization, we can coordinate the factual questions and deliver findings to your attorney. Counsel advises you on disclosure requirements, agreement language and the decision to sign.
A public post may raise a question about parenting time, a living arrangement or a financial claim. We investigate relevant social media activity for Washington family matters, preserving the post, its source and surrounding context before comparing it with other records. We check who a profile belongs to and what a date or location tag actually establishes.
We review relevant public profiles and other material lawfully supplied to us, record source URLs and capture dates, and compare posts and stories with the events in question. Platform dates, reposts and location labels need care: they may not identify when or where the underlying event occurred.
Research: Build post and story timelines, compare profile links and check location or date claims against independent information.
Questions we can check: Who provided care during parenting time, whether repeated posts suggest a shared residence, or whether public work and lifestyle claims warrant further financial research.
What you receive: Relevant captures with URLs, date context and an explanation of what was corroborated, what conflicts and what remains a lead.
The strongest starting point is a particular event or statement you need to check. A broad search through someone’s online life may add cost without answering that question.
Check relevant public interactions and dates without treating a photograph or online friendship as proof of infidelity.
Compare public statements about residence, cohabitation or property use with other records relevant to a divorce.
Preserve relevant posts about caregiving or exchanges and check their dates against the parenting schedule.
Compare dated online activity with the actual order, exchange records and communications about missed time.
Identify public work or cohabitation claims for corroboration; social posts alone do not establish income or change support.
Look for repeated, corroborated signs of a shared residence. A tagged photograph or one visit is not enough.
Check caregiver identity, timing and notice against the actual right-of-first-refusal provision and records of the event.
Examine public residence and movement claims around a disputed move, keeping posted dates separate from verified move dates.
Preserve relevant online communications and conduct with the order’s actual terms available for legal review.
Keep incident chronology and corroborating posts intact. Immediate safety needs and law-enforcement response come before an investigation.
Preserve public threats or lawfully held communications with source context, without delaying emergency help or safety planning.
The linked statutes address private-investigator work and private communications in Washington. Public visibility and lawful authority determine what we can review; a request from a spouse or parent does not authorize entry into someone else’s private account.
RCW 18.165 - Washington private investigator framework
RCW 9.73.030 - Private communications and recording
Bring profile URLs, relevant dates and the statement or event you want checked. Keep original messages and complete captures where you have them; cropped screenshots may omit important context.
Scope: We agree on the relevant platforms, time period and question. If a useful lead needs records research or observation, we discuss that work before expanding the task.
Reporting: Your report records the work completed, findings and limits. It is due by 9 p.m. Pacific on the next business day after the task ends, including return travel. Completion after midnight counts as that new calendar date. Business days exclude weekends and the specified federal holiday periods, including the day before and after each holiday. Faster delivery costs $300 per report only when you request it and we accept, plus report-writing time. We notify you of an updated delivery date if approved additional report work or priority delays affect the schedule.
It can help when a specific public post, profile or lawfully held message bears on a disputed date, activity or statement. Preserve the source, date and surrounding context. A profile match or location tag is a lead to corroborate, not proof of identity or location by itself; private accounts require lawful authority.
We start with the claim, date range and known profile URLs. We check that the account is connected to the right person, preserve relevant public material and identify which claims need corroboration. Private material is reviewed only when there is lawful authority to provide and examine it.
Yes. Public posts may identify an address, witness or activity worth checking through records, an interview or lawful observation. We agree on the additional work rather than treating a post as a final conclusion.
RCW 18.165 provides the Washington investigator framework, and RCW 9.73.030 addresses private communications and recording. Written documentation is our default. We obtain the consent required by law before audio recording rather than assume a family connection or attorney request supplies it.
A witness may be able to clarify an exchange, caregiving routine, or incident through what they personally saw or heard. We conduct neutral interviews for Washington family matters, document accounts in writing, and obtain the consent required by Washington law before any audio recording.
Use RCW 18.165 to review Washington’s private-investigator framework and Washington Courts for published forms and instructions. We can retrieve and organize records; counsel advises you on the forms and procedure your matter requires.
Messages, photos, files and account exports you lawfully provide may help explain a Washington family matter. We organize those records with available source and date information and identify gaps or uncertain context. We do not offer forensic examinations, device extraction or recovery, or technical testing.
Start with the family question and tell us where the material came from. We can organize messages, photographs, videos, files and account exports you lawfully provide, keeping available dates, metadata and source details together. Comparing related records can help show where a screenshot lacks context or a timeline still has gaps.
Records we organize: Client-provided messages, photos, videos, files and exports, with available dates and source context.
Access boundary: Share only records you are authorized to provide. Possessing a device, knowing a password or working with an attorney does not itself establish a right to another person's private information.
What you receive: An organized set of the provided records, available source and date notes, and a summary of what they support and where context is missing.
Messages and online records can help check specific claims about contact, caregiving, residence or money. We review the material against the question you need answered, including evidence that does not support the concern.
Compare relevant, lawfully obtained messages or public posts with the dates in question. Digital contact alone does not establish an affair.
Review authorized records for dates and statements relevant to residence, cohabitation, property use or finances in a divorce.
Examine authorized business and property-related files for ownership and transaction leads that counsel or a financial specialist can pursue.
Compare dated communications and other authorized records with disputed work or cohabitation claims. Counsel assesses their effect on support.
Review current work and residence information in lawfully supplied records alongside the dates relevant to a support modification.
Preserve messages about caregiving and exchanges with surrounding context, and distinguish recorded facts from a parent’s account.
Identify financial and work-activity leads in authorized files, retaining the source so the claim can be checked.
Preserve authorized communications and location-related leads for counsel or law enforcement when a child has been removed. Seek emergency assistance immediately when needed.
Retain the complete relevant conversation and its dates when contact or conduct may conflict with an order.
Document the origin and sequence of messages or other records relevant to a restraining order for legal review.
Preserve direct and indirect contact messages and their source details without replying in a way that breaches an order.
Preserve incident-related communications and media you lawfully hold. Immediate help and safety planning take priority over digital evidence work.
Washington’s investigator framework and private-communications law are linked below. Before recording or sharing private data, confirm the authority for the specific source; a family relationship does not remove another person’s privacy rights.
RCW 18.165 - Washington private investigator framework
RCW 9.73.030 - Private communications and recording
Tell us what records exist, where they came from and the event or claim they may help check. Share only materials you are authorized to provide; do not send a device for examination or altered files as originals.
Scope: We organize digital records clients lawfully provide. We do not offer forensic examinations, device extraction or recovery, technical testing, or forensic-specialist work.
Messages, photographs, videos, files and account exports may be useful when you can lawfully share them. Tell us the question they relate to and what you know about their source. We organize the provided records; we do not examine devices or recover deleted data.
No. We do not hack devices, break into accounts, extract or recover device data, or perform forensic testing. We organize only records you lawfully provide and do not access another person’s private account.
You receive the agreed organized records, available source and handling notes, and a dated chronology explaining what the material shows. Missing context, uncertain timestamps and unanswered questions remain visible rather than being treated as established facts.
Court papers need to reach the right person in the way the case requires. We help families and attorneys arrange process service across Washington, checking address leads, planning attempts around known routines and documenting what happens. When several counties or an evasive recipient are involved, we discuss travel, deadlines and the next reasonable attempt before using more of your budget.
We review the documents, the service instructions and what you know about the recipient. An address check or observation may help avoid repeated visits to an old address. For each attempt, we record the date, time, location, person contacted and result; completed service includes the appropriate proof of service.
Address confirmation before attempts
Check the location and lawful access points before an attempt
Plan attempts around known work and home routines
Use a lawful stakeout when a likely service window needs confirmation
Proof of service documentation
Coordinate routes across counties with the stated deadline in mind
A change in address or an unresponsive party can complicate several kinds of family proceedings. The documents and service requirements depend on the matter.
Preserve address leads and a dated movement history for counsel and law enforcement when a child has been removed without authorization. Process service supports the legal proceeding; urgent danger requires emergency help.
Check when a residence changed and where service may be attempted during a disputed move. Your attorney handles relocation notice requirements and legal decisions.
Document caregiving history and witness information while arranging service required for the proceeding. The court decides visitation eligibility.
Gather care-history facts and address information needed for service in a minor-guardianship matter. An investigator does not decide who should become guardian.
Keep the existing order, dated exchanges, missed parenting time and communications together when arranging service in a parenting-plan dispute.
Check residence and work-location leads that may help serve documents in a support matter. Counsel determines how the findings affect the claim.
RCW 18.165 addresses Washington private investigators. Washington Courts publishes forms and instructions that may apply to your matter; confirm the required documents and service method with counsel or the applicable court instructions.
RCW 18.165 - Washington private investigator framework
Washington Courts forms and instructions
Bring the papers to be served, the deadline and the most recent address or routine information you have. We can then discuss whether direct service attempts or further address research should come first.
Before scheduling: Identify each recipient, the relevant counties and any orders or access restrictions. We confirm the assignment and available schedule before an attempt.
Process service is used when court documents need to be delivered using the method required for the particular case. Bring the documents, known address information and deadline identified by counsel or court instructions. We plan lawful attempts and document what happened; an attempt does not guarantee completed service.
We check the recipient’s known addresses, work or home routine, access restrictions and service deadline. If the address is uncertain, we discuss address research first. Each attempt is planned around the instructions for your case and recorded even if service is unsuccessful.
Yes. Address research or lawful observation may establish where and when an attempt is practical. If additional work is needed, we confirm its scope and cost before proceeding.
Use current Washington Courts forms and read the summons and any service order actually issued in your case. The September 2025 update added a 60-day response period for service in a jail, detention or prison facility, unless a statute specifies a different time. Under CR 12(a), the general response period is 20 days after service, excluding the service day; personal service outside Washington generally allows 60 days, and publication generally allows 60 days from first publication. Other statutes, rules, motions or orders may alter the deadline. This is not a blanket 60-day rule for mailed documents; confirm the actual summons and applicable rule with counsel.
Keep the papers provided, recipient and address information, attempt dates and times, identity details, and the resulting proof of service or written acceptance. Personal service, accepted service, court-authorized mail and publication have different requirements. Counsel determines the permitted method and whether the documented diligence and proof are sufficient.
The January 2026 Confidential Information Form update also matters when organizing records. Use the current confidential form and appropriate cover sheets for protected identifiers and sensitive source documents rather than placing them in an unredacted public declaration. Follow the form instructions and counsel's guidance; not every document in a family-law case is automatically sealed.
For joinder or a missing-party question, lawful locate and records work can clarify who the person is, where they are and how their interests or relationship connect to the proceeding. Counsel determines participation, notice and the permitted service method.
FL All Family 001, revised January 2026, removed the paragraph 6 exemption for children's Social Security numbers in protection-order-only cases. Its mailing-address instruction expressly warns that the mailing address will not be kept private, and the form does not request financial-account numbers. Raise address-safety concerns with counsel or the court before supplying a protected location, and use the correct confidential form or cover sheet rather than putting sensitive identifiers in a public declaration.
Official references: Washington mandatory family law forms; August 2025 Forms Summary; January 2026 Forms Summary
The Washington Courts forms directory provides statewide forms and notes that individual courts may require additional forms or local rules. Check the instructions for the court handling your matter with your attorney. An investigative report does not replace a required declaration or filing.
The Washington Courts forms directory provides statewide forms and notes that individual courts may require additional forms or local rules. Check the instructions for the court handling your matter with your attorney. An investigative report does not replace a required declaration or filing.
The Washington Courts forms directory provides statewide forms and notes that individual courts may require additional forms or local rules. Check the instructions for the court handling your matter with your attorney. An investigative report does not replace a required declaration or filing.
The Washington Courts forms directory provides statewide forms and notes that additional local forms or rules may apply. Please identify the requirements governing the requested material; an investigative report does not itself replace a required declaration or filing.
Tell us what happened, which records you have and when you need the findings. We can discuss lawful investigative work and its limits.
Request a free consultation